When the zero-running C10 was launched, it claimed to be “a more ideal home for young people.
” This “ideal” is naturally a pun.
However, apart from refrigerators, color TVs, large sofas and cost performance, there are very few online videos talking about zero-driving in smart driving.
To this end, we took a zero-running C10 530 smart driving version equipped with lidar and the official guidance price was 168,800 yuan.
In fact, it is a “pioneering behavior” to carry a lidar on cars with less than 200,000 cars.
So in terms of experience, how “ideal” can the C10 make young people feel? Focusing on the intelligence that young people are very concerned about today, we conducted two tests on the zero-running C10: venue obstacle simulation test and automatic parking to see whether the zero-running C10 can cope with obstacles and whether the parking function is practical.
, Field obstacle simulation test, we restored six obstacles at Bridgestone’s professional closed venue: wild animal crossing, guiding cone barrel, static front and rear, horizontal vehicle, front vehicle pressing line and night backlight accident vehicle.
, Turn on the LCC function of the zero-running C10 to drive towards obstacles at different speeds to see if it can avoid them.
At the same time, if 2 of the 3 tests under speed are successful, speed up and test again.
, The results are as follows: , Among them, the guide cone simulates a construction section that suddenly appears on a high speed, and the accident vehicle tilted at 45 degrees at night simulates a collision accident scene that suddenly appears when the field of vision is unclear.
The starting speed of these two items is 60km/h.
, Wild animals traverse and simulate small animals that suddenly emerge in urban scenes.
We use traction equipment to move the small animals at a speed of 6km/h, and ensure that the vehicle does not slow down.
The collision point between the two is 50%.
This starting speed is 35km/h.
In these three items, the zero-running C10 could not be recognized and had no response at the starting speed.
APA Automatic Parking, Test Parking Space We selected the most common right-angle garage parking space for testing, and obstacles were added on both sides of the parking space to simulate vehicles.
Start the test according to the distance of adding 1 meter to the vehicle width.
If it succeeds, it will be reduced by 0.
1 meter, and if it fails, it will be widened by 0.
1 meter.
Test 3 times.
If it is parked twice, it will be considered success.
Continue to test the next distance until the limit distance is measured.
The zero-running C10 parking results are as follows: The starting position of the car body is 1 meter horizontally and 5 meters vertically away from the parking space.
The target parking space is the second and middle parking space in the forward direction.
, During the actual measurement, we also found an interesting point: In fact, before the zero-running C10 found the target parking space, the SR interface showed that the first parking space was found.
When we stepped on the brake and parked next to the target parking space, the zero-running C10’s recognition of the first target will be cancelled.
It seems that its strategy is quite specific in choosing parking spaces and likes closer parking spaces.
In terms of the size of the parking space, the zero-running C10 can park a parking space that is 0.
6 meters wider than its own car.
In daily life, when encountering a right-angle garage with an occupied part of the parking space, it can still help.
Does this performance combined with its price point think it is ideal enough?, Return to the first electric network home page>,.
