It is said that the next step of new energy is intelligence, and intelligent driving is the core part of intelligence.
As a result, this field has become a necessary place for auto companies to compete with the future.
It seems that which car company, a mainstream model does not mention smart driving, represents that it is behind the times.
Concepts such as ADS 3.
0, end-to-end, AI model, etc.
, continue to give new value and connotation to intelligent driving, making consumers feel competent or classy.
Or high-end smart driving in urban areas, unmanned valet parking, and so on, the intelligent ability of cars in some complex scenes has been widely spread in the form of small videos or official selling points of press conferences, which not only makes the intelligent ability of car companies be respected and sought after, but also makes ordinary consumers think that the ability of intelligent driving has developed to a very high level.
But the reality is that with the popularity of smart driving, the resulting security accidents are becoming more and more frequent, and more cases of smart driving problems appear on the Internet, causing people to question, debate and worry about the safety of smart driving.
From the rubbing caused by parking to the unexpected situation of smart driving while driving, and even casualties caused by too much trust in smart driving, constantly provoking a crisis of trust between users and smart drivers.
In fact, there is nothing wrong with smart driving, it is the only way for the development of intelligent cars, the force of science and technology to promote forward, but also an important bearing of the industrial revolution.
So the consumer is at fault? It seems that at present, the main responsibility for all the occurrence of intelligent driving lies with the driver himself, because the improper use or operation has nothing to do with the ability and function of intelligent driving.
It is understandable if it is an individual case, but for the common occurrence of similar incidents, do enterprises, as the providers of smart driving products, assume their own responsibilities and obligations, or even be in awe of the advanced development of technology? Accidents occur frequently, should you admit your bad luck? Recently, a domestic new energy brand that promotes smart driving ability has successively experienced smart driving accidents.
There are people who drive smart cars into overpass pillars on urban roads, those who encounter sheep driving on highways, those who sell them into buses with customers’ experience of smart driving, and those who are killed and injured in a collision with a big truck when driving smart cars.
Although the final conclusion of these problems is that there is nothing wrong with the function of the vehicle, improper operation, beyond the scope of intelligent driving and cause accidents.
Finally, the car owner found that the original press conference publicized that “it is difficult to hit” does not mean that it will not hit, this is a probability event, and only users who have really experienced death brushing their shoulders will feel deeply.
These smart driving accidents are not exclusive to this brand.
It is also another new power brand, some identify high-speed billboards as vehicles in front and cause sudden brake rear-end collisions, some do not identify and prohibit accidents on the highway, and some cause car accidents by using automatic parking in parking lots.
In short, accidents that may occur when everyone is driving, or even impossible accidents, may happen again.
In fact, what I mentioned above are only news reports and relatively serious smart driving accidents.
in fact, for many users who use smart driving, there are not a few cases of smart driving.
Looking at the forums of some car brands, consumers’ pain points and worries about smart driving are very common.
For example, when using the smart driving function of a certain car, a car owner said that when he was driving at a 120km/h speed on the highway at night, he suddenly encountered a sudden brake in front of the car, and his car accelerated to the right side and rushed out of the line, and he was frightened.
The owner said there was a car in the right lane at that time, but luckily it didn’t hit it.
Since then, car owners have rarely used smart driving on the highway at night.
For example, some car owners think that this function does not liberate their hands, feet and brain, because they are more uncomfortable and more nervous than themselves when they take over the vehicle at any time, especially when they encounter slow cars or sudden brakes in front of them.
most of the smart driving experience is not as relaxed as real driving, scared or strangled by seat belts.
When some car owners were using smart driving on the highway, they encountered a row of cones on a section of the road, the road narrowed directly, and the road route was disrupted.
At this time, the car didn’t change lanes in time and almost hit the cone, and the owner was frightened.
Car owners think that this kind of scene is not a difficult special scene, but a situation that ordinary car owners may encounter every day, and there will be problems in such a simple situation, which shows that the intelligent driving technology of various manufacturers is not very mature.
It can even be said that almost any car company or brand that promotes the strong ability of smart driving has frightened car owners because of the uncertainties of smart driving safety, such as emergency braking, rear-end collision, wrong identification, and so on, and even have related safety accidents.
Because so far, no car company dares to say that its smart driving system can guarantee absolute safety, just as more and more car companies dare not say that their new energy vehicles are natural.
As a result, many consumers also question: car companies promote how good the function is, how many kilometers of high speed and urban smart driving take over, the utilization rate of smart driving is very high, the mileage is very long, how convenient is automatic parking, and why are there still frequent problems in the end? If it is just the damage to the vehicle, it is okay to say that it is covered by insurance, and if you put it on the user’s side, you will consider yourself unlucky.
At most, you will regret it and remind yourself to be cautious about using the smart driving function.
However, if casualties occur, as far as traffic law is concerned, it will basically be judged as the driver’s own responsibility.
Even if the car owner or the owner’s family thinks that it is the problem of the intelligent driving system, there is also a difficult dilemma of proof and rights protection, because the intelligent driving data of various brands are in their own hands, both referees and athletes, and only car owners and family members regret it.
Tech for Good, which still lacks awe, ranges from several car brands to launch pilot auxiliary urban functions, to the “map-free city NOA” ability to carry more models, and then to the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology and other five departments have identified 20 cities (consortia) as intelligent network-connected vehicles “car-road-cloud integration” application pilot cities.
In recent years, the intelligent driving track has become a new blue ocean in the automobile industry.
Just last week, the 2024 World Intelligent Network Automotive Congress was held, Intelligent Network Automotive has become a hot spot of innovation in the industry, and the structure of modern automobile industry is facing large-scale restructuring.
Li Shufu, Qiu Xiandong, Zhu Huarong, Zeng Qinghong, Lei Jun, and other heads of car companies have expressed their views and views on intelligent network connected cars, believing that the era of intelligent network connection has come.
Statistics show that from 2016 to 2023, domestic intelligenceThe size of the driving market increased from 49 billion yuan to 199.
6 billion yuan.
Another data is that from January to June this year, the penetration rate of new L2 cars of Chinese passenger cars was 55.
7%, of which the penetration rate of new cars with pilot-assisted driving function reached 11.
0%, and the market is becoming more and more hot.
The Chinese Society of Automotive Engineering predicts that the output value of the intelligent network automobile industry will exceed 700 billion yuan by 2025 and reach 2.
6 trillion yuan by 2030.
Strong market demand and capital promotion will accelerate the development of smart cars and smart driving to millions of households.
What needs to be affirmed is that, on the one hand, the smart driving function promotes the progress of the industry and the development of science and technology, and to a certain extent, it does provide help to alleviate people’s driving fatigue and ensure safety under some working conditions.
However, many facts have also proved that the current intelligent driving is still in the initial stage of development, and the occurrence of more safety accidents also means that there are still many limitations of the intelligent driving system, although car companies emphasize the convenience of intelligent driving in their publicity.
For example, in some cases, the system may fail to detect, misdetect, or fail to detect obstacles in time, resulting in failure to warn or brake in time.
These include poor weather conditions, blocking by large vehicles ahead, low contrast between obstacles and the environment, and even uncertain and unrecorded system BUG.
In order to strengthen the intelligent driving ability and seize the first-mover advantage of intelligent driving, some car companies exaggerate its function when publicizing.
For example, car companies can only achieve 5 points, but blow 10 points to the outside world.
some car companies can only achieve 5 points, but only 3 points, each car company in the face of smart driving bottom line and boundaries are not the same.
Many consumers are either affected by publicity, or think that smart driving is really easy and safe in many actual experiences, resulting in some users blindly trusting the system, some people use mineral water bottles to deceive the steering wheel gravity sensor, while driving while sleeping, some even leave the main driving, shooting videos posted on the Internet to promote the strength of their smart driving, finally because of trust or public opinion Or it is the wrong transmission of values, leading to tragedy.
It is obvious that these problems will become great challenges in the development of new energy vehicles and intelligent driving.
Once there are too many negative cases, intelligent driving will become an “invisible killer” that may lead to traffic accidents.
It will cause some people’s disgust or even resistance to the intelligent driving system, which will hinder the widespread popularity of intelligent driving and road tests in the future.
This requires, on the one hand, car companies need to constantly improve the technical level and improve the intelligent driving system.
on the other hand, they also need to be more careful to convey product functions to consumers to avoid misunderstandings and high expectations.
At the same time, both laws and regulations need to impose another curse on the safety of smart driving.
leaving it to the market to compete will promote development quickly, but at the same time, the price behind it will also become painful.
Just as Tesla was recently investigated by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration for problems with the FSD (fully self-driving) system in the United States, a total of more than 2.
4 million vehicles.
The reason for the investigation was that there were four reports of accidents in which there were doubts about the safe use of the system in foggy days, bright lights or reduced road visibility.
These actions have also sounded the alarm for the security development of the intelligent driving industry.
The so-called Tech for Good, that is, technology should focus on human life.
The development of science and technology must always give priority to the safety and health of the people, which is the fundamental principle and ultimate goal of the development of science and technology.
It would be too cruel if the promotion of an industry is to use the blood and lives of more people.
, return to the first electric network home page >.
