On October 5, Great Wall Motors released a report on the online rumor “Tank 300(Parameters| Inquiry) A description of the seat belt rupture event.
It was stated that after comprehensive and meticulous investigation, combined with an inspection of the scene of the Tank 300 accident vehicle and contacting the insurance company to obtain the initial photos of the accident provided by the first on-site personnel, it was confirmed that the accident vehicle was modified and a third-party transfer lock was added.
The seat belt rupture incident was indeed caused by modification, not a product quality issue.
, 
,,,, the following is the original explanation: Recently, rumors of “an accident occurred in a tank 300: the seat belt broke” appeared on the Internet, causing widespread attention and heated discussion.
The tank brand was highly concerned about this and rushed to the scene as soon as possible, and jointly launched an in-depth investigation with relevant departments.
The investigation results are now explained as follows: After comprehensive and meticulous investigation, combined with an inspection of the scene of the Tank 300 accident vehicle and contacting the insurance company to obtain the initial photos of the accident provided by the first on-site personnel, it was confirmed that the accident vehicle was modified and a third-party transfer lock was added.
The seat belt rupture incident was indeed caused by modification, not a product quality issue.
The analysis of the principle is as follows: First, at the moment of the accident, the pre-tightening point of the seat belt retractor exploded and the third-party transfer plug lock was forcibly pulled and disengaged.
At this time, the force was as high as 1.
8KN or more.
This greatly reduces the restraint of the seat belt system on the occupant, which in turn leads to abnormal disengagement of the occupant.
Second, the pre-tightening end pieces were then pre-tightened and ignited.
After the installed third-party transfer lock was disengaged, the seat belt system was in a free and relaxed state.
In a free state, the small lock head at the connection between the pre-tightened end piece and the seat belt is subjected to the dual effects of the pre-tightening force of the pre-tightened end piece and the abnormal forward and out-of-position diving force of the passenger, and has an abnormal impact with the lower trim plate of the B-pillar.
Damage.
Excessive acceleration causes the small lock head to deform, weakening the mechanism to prevent inertia dissociation, and eventually disengagement occurs.
Here, I would like to remind everyone: Wearing the seat belt correctly can closely fit the waist and shoulders of the occupant.
During the pre-tightening process, the shoulder and waist webbing will be tightened, effectively reducing the amount of inertial dive of the crew, thus playing an important role in protecting the crew.
As a key safety accessory, seat belts must not be modified privately and must be worn correctly.
If users have doubts about this issue in the future, we are willing to work with users to entrust a third-party appraisal agency to conduct an appraisal.
Finally, the tank brand once again solemnly declares: We always adhere to the “user-centered” concept, make every effort to help users solve problems encountered in the process of using vehicles, and actively meet users ‘reasonable demands.
at the same time, we will also firmly safeguard our legitimate rights and interests.
Regarding rumors, rumors and other behaviors that infringe on the legitimate rights and interests of tank brands, we will not hesitate to use legal means to resolutely safeguard our legitimate rights and interests, including holding accountable any person who makes false remarks on online platforms about this incident and other joint legal responsibilities.
(Compiled/Car Home Zhouyi), return to the home page of First Electric Network>,.
