A few days ago, a car blogger conducted a collision test with a 90% overlap rate between Xiaomi SU7 (parameters | inquiry) and 60krypton 007.
“Click to view the original video”.
After the collision, Xiaomi SU7 could not open the car door properly due to the loss of the positive wire of the small battery, and then Xiaomi officials and test bloggers also responded.
, 
, , , Xiaomi’s official reply is as follows: , , , , , , we have noticed the relevant information.
After analysis, we think that this so-called “test” is not rigorous in setting, incomplete in record, and unscientific in conclusion.
Our findings in the preliminary analysis are now reported to you: first, the statement that the relevant test “automatic emergency call system (E-CALL) fails after collision” is not true.
After investigation, the call center called and connected immediately after the collision, and the continuous call in the background lasted for 5 minutes without receiving any feedback.
After that, the owner’s registered mobile phone number was dialed back for a total of 5 times, all of which were not answered.
Second, with regard to the relevant information about “small battery power outage” that netizens are concerned about, according to the data of the national monitoring platform: the vehicle data was offline for a long time before the collision, and the small battery was disconnected for a long time.
then, the small battery was connected again.
At the time of the collision, the data of the national monitoring platform was missing and the small battery was in a state of power off.
We cannot confirm whether the electrode is locked according to the standard when the small battery is powered on again in this process, nor can we rule out the possibility that the small battery will be powered off after the collision due to improper assembly.
Third, Xiaomi SU7 has conducted stringent collision tests in the development process without safety risks and did not have the problems described in the video.
We have full confidence in the quality of Xiaomi SU7’s products, and we also appeal that vehicle crash testing is a complex, rigorous and extremely serious test, which should be carried out by professional institutions.
At the same time, for not rigorous, complete, serious testing, we also urge you not to accept, do not spread, thank you for your attention and support! The blogger apologized and declared: 
, previously released “when Xiaomi SU7 crashed into a polar krypton 007.
“in the video, we reflect and review all the questions from netizens’ feedback one by one, and use the past day to find a new millet SU7 to verify, and find that there may be a problem that the plug is not installed tightly in the handling of the positive power cord, but because we have no way to verify the actual tightening torque, the statement that the battery positive power cord is knocked off is not accurate.
And the expression will affect the judgment of the following part of the conclusion, resulting in the content causing confusion and misleading to the audience.
Here, I solemnly apologize to Xiaomi Automobile and all friends who watched this issue before.
After confirming that the problem existed, we immediately recorded an apology video and modified the previous version of the video.
We will permanently put this apology content and apology video link at the top of the comments section, and are willing to bear all the losses caused by this mistake.
With regard to the position of the video, I would also like to explain it here.
The content of this issue does not contain any commercial elements, and no enterprise has interfered with the content, which we can accept any form of investigation.
The original intention of making this video is that some fans put forward this topic in the comments section, and in order to meet the wishes of fans as much as possible, we withdrew part of our annual content budget and finally produced this content.
Of course, the problem is not that the fans put forward the topic, but that the rigor of the content is not the best, which is entirely our own reason.
I’m sorry to disappoint the fans.
We have also made a profound reflection on this content, and we should maintain a more rigorous attitude in the face of professional content in order to present the most authentic performance of each car to every audience, and then we will re-comb the production process of all the content to avoid every possible inadequacy.
For such content as outdoor collision, because its details can not be completely controlled, we will also give up the production of similar content and avoid some problems at the beginning of some projects.
For the failure to achieve 100% rigor in the content, I apologize to all the viewers again, and I apologize to Xiaomi once again, and thank you very much for all kinds of questions about this incident.
Different voices can make us better find our own problems.
(compiled / Automotive Home Guo Chen), return to the first electric network home page >.
